<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FAQ: How do you compare to Selenium?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.browsermob.com/2008/12/faq-how-do-you-compare-to-selenium/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.browsermob.com/2008/12/faq-how-do-you-compare-to-selenium/</link>
	<description>All about browsers, performance testing, and load testing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:39:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Lightbody</title>
		<link>http://blog.browsermob.com/2008/12/faq-how-do-you-compare-to-selenium/comment-page-1/#comment-2864</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Lightbody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 02:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.browsermob.com/2008/12/faq-how-do-you-compare-to-selenium/#comment-2864</guid>
		<description>John,
We didn&#039;t respond to nik&#039;s comment because we don&#039;t really understand what he&#039;s asking. Yes, we do use a massive amount of hardware, and yes that is what differentiates us. We should have added a comment here back when he made his comment, but I believe we also received an email from him and continued the conversation there.

As for HtmlUnit, it is in our roadmap: we anticipate adding it this year. It will definitely bring the price down somewhere between our RBU and VU services. However, it will not really offer the same functionality as the RBU/Selenium-based service. For example, HtmlUnit doesn&#039;t do concurrent threads for HTTP requests, it doesn&#039;t allow for screenshots/movies, it doesn&#039;t fully parse CSS and pull down all objects, and the JavaScript emulation doesn&#039;t always work perfectly. But it is a pretty good alternative and we are excited to support it soon!

Patrick
Founder, BrowserMob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,<br />
We didn&#8217;t respond to nik&#8217;s comment because we don&#8217;t really understand what he&#8217;s asking. Yes, we do use a massive amount of hardware, and yes that is what differentiates us. We should have added a comment here back when he made his comment, but I believe we also received an email from him and continued the conversation there.</p>
<p>As for HtmlUnit, it is in our roadmap: we anticipate adding it this year. It will definitely bring the price down somewhere between our RBU and VU services. However, it will not really offer the same functionality as the RBU/Selenium-based service. For example, HtmlUnit doesn&#8217;t do concurrent threads for HTTP requests, it doesn&#8217;t allow for screenshots/movies, it doesn&#8217;t fully parse CSS and pull down all objects, and the JavaScript emulation doesn&#8217;t always work perfectly. But it is a pretty good alternative and we are excited to support it soon!</p>
<p>Patrick<br />
Founder, BrowserMob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lockhart</title>
		<link>http://blog.browsermob.com/2008/12/faq-how-do-you-compare-to-selenium/comment-page-1/#comment-2863</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lockhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 02:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.browsermob.com/2008/12/faq-how-do-you-compare-to-selenium/#comment-2863</guid>
		<description>Hi, I&#039;m trying to assess browsermob and it looks great. I love the idea of load tests based on selenium scripts but one concern and one question:

Concern: How come no reply to the question above from nik posted 4 months ago?

Question: Why don&#039;t you offer htmlunit as another option which would reduce the cost cf firefox and provide full equivalent functionality (at least in theory) with the javascript support from rhino turned on. Does selenium RC which I guess you use not work with HTMLUnit/Rhino?

thanks and regards,
                   John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I&#8217;m trying to assess browsermob and it looks great. I love the idea of load tests based on selenium scripts but one concern and one question:</p>
<p>Concern: How come no reply to the question above from nik posted 4 months ago?</p>
<p>Question: Why don&#8217;t you offer htmlunit as another option which would reduce the cost cf firefox and provide full equivalent functionality (at least in theory) with the javascript support from rhino turned on. Does selenium RC which I guess you use not work with HTMLUnit/Rhino?</p>
<p>thanks and regards,<br />
                   John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nik</title>
		<link>http://blog.browsermob.com/2008/12/faq-how-do-you-compare-to-selenium/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>nik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 10:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.browsermob.com/2008/12/faq-how-do-you-compare-to-selenium/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Selenium uses real browsers, meaning you need a ton of hardware to simulate a load test.

is this not a comfusing thing when Browsermob claims is using real browsers as it main benefit over the rest of apps doing the same?.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Selenium uses real browsers, meaning you need a ton of hardware to simulate a load test.</p>
<p>is this not a comfusing thing when Browsermob claims is using real browsers as it main benefit over the rest of apps doing the same?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: blog.browsermob.com @ 2012-02-08 07:53:29 -->
