<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Public DNS vs OpenDNS vs Your ISP&#8217;s DNS &#8211; measuring performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/</link>
	<description>All about browsers, performance testing, and load testing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:39:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Kimble</title>
		<link>http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/comment-page-4/#comment-28371</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Kimble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/#comment-28371</guid>
		<description>Hargray.com 64.203.254.30 - HHI, SC 29928

Starting test...

Test 1: Google
125344 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: Google
75406 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: Google
73172 ms for 1000 records
Test 1: OpenDNS
170625 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: OpenDNS
44609 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: OpenDNS
43844 ms for 1000 records
Test 1: Your DNS
349422 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: Your DNS
57531 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: Your DNS
36547 ms for 1000 records

Horrible</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hargray.com 64.203.254.30 &#8211; HHI, SC 29928</p>
<p>Starting test&#8230;</p>
<p>Test 1: Google<br />
125344 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: Google<br />
75406 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: Google<br />
73172 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 1: OpenDNS<br />
170625 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: OpenDNS<br />
44609 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: OpenDNS<br />
43844 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 1: Your DNS<br />
349422 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: Your DNS<br />
57531 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: Your DNS<br />
36547 ms for 1000 records</p>
<p>Horrible</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/comment-page-4/#comment-27368</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 05:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/#comment-27368</guid>
		<description>Location: Switzerland
Provider: Cablecom 20 Mbit/s

Test 1: Google
88838 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: Google
35237 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: Google
33747 ms for 1000 records
Test 1: OpenDNS
185065 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: OpenDNS
81455 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: OpenDNS
94777 ms for 1000 records
Test 1: Your DNS
163681 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: Your DNS
105221 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: Your DNS
69752 ms for 1000 records</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Location: Switzerland<br />
Provider: Cablecom 20 Mbit/s</p>
<p>Test 1: Google<br />
88838 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: Google<br />
35237 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: Google<br />
33747 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 1: OpenDNS<br />
185065 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: OpenDNS<br />
81455 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: OpenDNS<br />
94777 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 1: Your DNS<br />
163681 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: Your DNS<br />
105221 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: Your DNS<br />
69752 ms for 1000 records</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcelo Maciel</title>
		<link>http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/comment-page-4/#comment-27006</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcelo Maciel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/#comment-27006</guid>
		<description>NET Virtua Belo Horizonte MG Brasil - 201.17.128.103

Test 1: Google
145657 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: Google
160539 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: Google
191882 ms for 1000 records
Test 1: OpenDNS
206190 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: OpenDNS
186036 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: OpenDNS
361860 ms for 1000 records
Test 1: Your DNS
281969 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: Your DNS
44509 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: Your DNS
51130 ms for 1000 records

My ISP DNS is faster, but the first test was terrible. I will continue using Open DNS for the filters I can you in my house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NET Virtua Belo Horizonte MG Brasil &#8211; 201.17.128.103</p>
<p>Test 1: Google<br />
145657 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: Google<br />
160539 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: Google<br />
191882 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 1: OpenDNS<br />
206190 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: OpenDNS<br />
186036 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: OpenDNS<br />
361860 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 1: Your DNS<br />
281969 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: Your DNS<br />
44509 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: Your DNS<br />
51130 ms for 1000 records</p>
<p>My ISP DNS is faster, but the first test was terrible. I will continue using Open DNS for the filters I can you in my house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Roberts</title>
		<link>http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/comment-page-4/#comment-26637</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/#comment-26637</guid>
		<description>&quot;Taking the lowest time and dividing by 1000 tells us the average DNS lookup times from our location in Portland, OR&quot;

Actually this tells us the minimum DNS lookup times. If you want the average you need to add all three of the tests and divide by 3000. This gives:

Google: 73.3ms
OpenDNS: 62.1ms
QwestDNS: 38.0ms</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Taking the lowest time and dividing by 1000 tells us the average DNS lookup times from our location in Portland, OR&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually this tells us the minimum DNS lookup times. If you want the average you need to add all three of the tests and divide by 3000. This gives:</p>
<p>Google: 73.3ms<br />
OpenDNS: 62.1ms<br />
QwestDNS: 38.0ms</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/comment-page-4/#comment-24884</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 00:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/#comment-24884</guid>
		<description>Time Warner Cable - Brooklyn, NY (209.18.47.61)

Test 1: Google
45049 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: Google
40444 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: Google
47059 ms for 1000 records
Test 1: OpenDNS
202762 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: OpenDNS
69420 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: OpenDNS
68354 ms for 1000 records
Test 1: Your DNS
119396 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: Your DNS
133853 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: Your DNS
124729 ms for 1000 records</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time Warner Cable &#8211; Brooklyn, NY (209.18.47.61)</p>
<p>Test 1: Google<br />
45049 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: Google<br />
40444 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: Google<br />
47059 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 1: OpenDNS<br />
202762 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: OpenDNS<br />
69420 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: OpenDNS<br />
68354 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 1: Your DNS<br />
119396 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: Your DNS<br />
133853 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: Your DNS<br />
124729 ms for 1000 records</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anfy</title>
		<link>http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/comment-page-4/#comment-24578</link>
		<dc:creator>Anfy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/#comment-24578</guid>
		<description>java -jar browsermob-dns-perf.jar 195.54.122.200 (BBB Swe)

Test 1: Google
114766 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: Google
49158 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: Google
43064 ms for 1000 records
Test 1: OpenDNS
202836 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: OpenDNS
59557 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: OpenDNS
34159 ms for 1000 records
Test 1: Your DNS
166599 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: Your DNS
21057 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: Your DNS
15511 ms for 1000 records</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>java -jar browsermob-dns-perf.jar 195.54.122.200 (BBB Swe)</p>
<p>Test 1: Google<br />
114766 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: Google<br />
49158 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: Google<br />
43064 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 1: OpenDNS<br />
202836 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: OpenDNS<br />
59557 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: OpenDNS<br />
34159 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 1: Your DNS<br />
166599 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: Your DNS<br />
21057 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: Your DNS<br />
15511 ms for 1000 records</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: not2much4u</title>
		<link>http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/comment-page-4/#comment-23848</link>
		<dc:creator>not2much4u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 21:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/#comment-23848</guid>
		<description>Starting test...

Test 1: Google
119547 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: Google
88390 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: Google
103662 ms for 1000 records
Test 1: OpenDNS
158590 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: OpenDNS
79544 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: OpenDNS
80013 ms for 1000 records
Test 1: Your DNS
106048 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: Your DNS
45489 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: Your DNS
66784 ms for 1000 records</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Starting test&#8230;</p>
<p>Test 1: Google<br />
119547 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: Google<br />
88390 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: Google<br />
103662 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 1: OpenDNS<br />
158590 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: OpenDNS<br />
79544 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: OpenDNS<br />
80013 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 1: Your DNS<br />
106048 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: Your DNS<br />
45489 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: Your DNS<br />
66784 ms for 1000 records</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TexasTrader</title>
		<link>http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/comment-page-4/#comment-21549</link>
		<dc:creator>TexasTrader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/#comment-21549</guid>
		<description>Open DNS by far faster than Goolge!

Test 1: Google
63031 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: Google
68359 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: Google
64954 ms for 1000 records
Test 1: OpenDNS
14390 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: OpenDNS
15531 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: OpenDNS
13891 ms for 1000 records
Exception in thread &quot;main&quot; java.net.UnknownHostException: 123.456.789.012
        at java.net.Inet4AddressImpl.lookupAllHostAddr(Native Method)
        at java.net.InetAddress$1.lookupAllHostAddr(Unknown Source)
        at java.net.InetAddress.getAddressFromNameService(Unknown Source)
        at java.net.InetAddress.getAllByName0(Unknown Source)
        at java.net.InetAddress.getAllByName(Unknown Source)
        at java.net.InetAddress.getAllByName(Unknown Source)
        at java.net.InetAddress.getByName(Unknown Source)
        at org.xbill.DNS.SimpleResolver.(SimpleResolver.java:59)
        at org.xbill.DNS.ExtendedResolver.(ExtendedResolver.java:283)
        at com.browsermob.dnsperf.Main.testSet(Main.java:50)
        at com.browsermob.dnsperf.Main.main(Main.java:45)

C:\TOOLS-UTILITIES\DNS_Utilities\DNS_Speedtests&gt;ping 192.168.1.1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open DNS by far faster than Goolge!</p>
<p>Test 1: Google<br />
63031 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: Google<br />
68359 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: Google<br />
64954 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 1: OpenDNS<br />
14390 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: OpenDNS<br />
15531 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: OpenDNS<br />
13891 ms for 1000 records<br />
Exception in thread &#8220;main&#8221; java.net.UnknownHostException: 123.456.789.012<br />
        at java.net.Inet4AddressImpl.lookupAllHostAddr(Native Method)<br />
        at java.net.InetAddress$1.lookupAllHostAddr(Unknown Source)<br />
        at java.net.InetAddress.getAddressFromNameService(Unknown Source)<br />
        at java.net.InetAddress.getAllByName0(Unknown Source)<br />
        at java.net.InetAddress.getAllByName(Unknown Source)<br />
        at java.net.InetAddress.getAllByName(Unknown Source)<br />
        at java.net.InetAddress.getByName(Unknown Source)<br />
        at org.xbill.DNS.SimpleResolver.(SimpleResolver.java:59)<br />
        at org.xbill.DNS.ExtendedResolver.(ExtendedResolver.java:283)<br />
        at com.browsermob.dnsperf.Main.testSet(Main.java:50)<br />
        at com.browsermob.dnsperf.Main.main(Main.java:45)</p>
<p>C:\TOOLS-UTILITIES\DNS_Utilities\DNS_Speedtests&gt;ping 192.168.1.1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vitor Mangraviti</title>
		<link>http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/comment-page-4/#comment-20605</link>
		<dc:creator>Vitor Mangraviti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/#comment-20605</guid>
		<description>If a DNS server takes an extra one fifth of a second looking up, that doesn&#039;t make any difference at all between them all.

I use Virgin Media in the UK but because my government is always blocking sites and spying on internet users, I rather use something else (along with proxies, VPN&#039;s and all the stuff required to be anonimous on the web).

Starting with OpenDNS, I was very happy with the service untill I hit a wall: Linux Samba X Windows shares. Simply doesn&#039;t work. That is because OpenDNS has a security feature that blocks unresolvable names.

As I couldn&#039;t be bothered to sort out the problem with OpenDNS, I am now using Google DNS - which is not the fastest resolving service but a tenth of a second is nothing to me.

I decided using a free DNS at the moment I tried to access &quot;The Pirate Bay&quot; and my DNS was blocking the site. From then on, I moved on to free DNS and other free services in order to have my privacy intact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a DNS server takes an extra one fifth of a second looking up, that doesn&#8217;t make any difference at all between them all.</p>
<p>I use Virgin Media in the UK but because my government is always blocking sites and spying on internet users, I rather use something else (along with proxies, VPN&#8217;s and all the stuff required to be anonimous on the web).</p>
<p>Starting with OpenDNS, I was very happy with the service untill I hit a wall: Linux Samba X Windows shares. Simply doesn&#8217;t work. That is because OpenDNS has a security feature that blocks unresolvable names.</p>
<p>As I couldn&#8217;t be bothered to sort out the problem with OpenDNS, I am now using Google DNS &#8211; which is not the fastest resolving service but a tenth of a second is nothing to me.</p>
<p>I decided using a free DNS at the moment I tried to access &#8220;The Pirate Bay&#8221; and my DNS was blocking the site. From then on, I moved on to free DNS and other free services in order to have my privacy intact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron C.</title>
		<link>http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/comment-page-4/#comment-20311</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 05:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.browsermob.com/2009/12/google-public-dns-vs-opendns-vs-your-isps-dns-measuring-performance/#comment-20311</guid>
		<description>Local ISP is Truvista Communications in SC.

Suprprisingly, google beat all, INCLUDING my local ISP. To top it, I&#039;ve been seeing a lot of recent reliability issues with my ISP&#039;s DNS servers.... I might just be switching...

Test 1: Google
90745 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: Google
31588 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: Google
31712 ms for 1000 records
Test 1: OpenDNS
254482 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: OpenDNS
48651 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: OpenDNS
46840 ms for 1000 records
Test 1: Your DNS
296114 ms for 1000 records
Test 2: Your DNS
35684 ms for 1000 records
Test 3: Your DNS
303917 ms for 1000 records</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Local ISP is Truvista Communications in SC.</p>
<p>Suprprisingly, google beat all, INCLUDING my local ISP. To top it, I&#8217;ve been seeing a lot of recent reliability issues with my ISP&#8217;s DNS servers&#8230;. I might just be switching&#8230;</p>
<p>Test 1: Google<br />
90745 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: Google<br />
31588 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: Google<br />
31712 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 1: OpenDNS<br />
254482 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: OpenDNS<br />
48651 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: OpenDNS<br />
46840 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 1: Your DNS<br />
296114 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 2: Your DNS<br />
35684 ms for 1000 records<br />
Test 3: Your DNS<br />
303917 ms for 1000 records</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: blog.browsermob.com @ 2012-02-08 08:42:20 -->
